Israel Folau and the Fight for Freedom
Back in 2017 I flew down to Tasmania to interview the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Hobart, Julian Porteous. The Archbishop had been brought before the Anti-Discrimination Board simply for producing a booklet outlining the traditional Christian understanding of marriage.
But the real reason I went was because—even before a decision on same-sex marriage had been reached—I could see that what was ultimately at stake was the issue of religious freedom. And now, only a couple of years later, that ‘threat’ has become a reality.
Israel Folau is now being sued by the gay political activist — and serial litigant — Gary Burns for ‘homosexual vilification’. This is despite the fact that Folau has been given an official apology by Rugby Australia. In case you’ve been living under a rock, or maybe just coming out of a medically-induced coma, this is what Folau had posted:
Interestingly, there have been no liars, fornicators, drunkards, adulterers, thieves, atheists or idolaters who have decided to take a similar course of action. Which is all the more significant when one considers that there are proportionally far more people that fit into one of these seven categories then there are who identify as being LGBTIQ+. In fact, looking again at the list, it includes absolutely everyone!
But there’s a connection between what Burns is doing to Folau now and what happened to Archbishop Porteous down in Hobart. And that is, the process is the punishment. Because the goal is not that the complainant will win, but it’s that you will go broke merely trying to defend yourself against them. Just ask Bernard Gaynor, who has had a staggering thirty-six complaints made against him by Burns and has even had to sell his house to finance his legal costs.
You see, as far as the law is concerned, Mr. Burns doesn’t really have a case. The legislation is already there giving people the freedom to form a different point of view on the basis of religious teaching. As Mark Latham tweeted:
NSW Anti-Discrimination Board decision to persecute Israel Folau is chilling for all religious preachers/freedoms.
Section 49ZT of the Act has an exemption from ‘Homosexual vilification’ action for ‘religious instruction’, discussion, debate and ‘expositions of any act or matter’— Real Mark Latham (@RealMarkLatham) December 13, 2019
What Latham is pointing out here is absolutely spot on. And the specific terminology that he is using is also just as important. Because the strategy of suing people into silence is part of a larger legal approach called the ‘chilling effect’. It’s what Wikipedia defines as “…the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat of legal sanction.”
Do you think any other denominational leader in Tasmania has produced a booklet on marriage since what happened to Porteous? Or has any other sporting celebrity been brave enough to post anything on social media similar to Israel Folau? That’s what the chilling effect achieves! And it is incredibly effective…
Maybe we should all change our Facebook profiles to Israel’s original post? Not to be offensive, but to prevent ourselves from being frozen out of the current situation. For make no mistake, this is not the end of the fight but rather, only the beginning. And it’s only a matter of time before the political activists catch up with you or me.
___
Photo: David Molloy, Wikimedia Commons.
Recent Articles:
22 April 2025
3.5 MINS
Vatican officials have announced that Pope Francis died early on Easter Monday at the age of 88. Catholics around the globe are mourning the loss of Pope Francis, but his papacy has had a mixed reception.
22 April 2025
6 MINS
Australia is yet again approaching an election in which neither party leader, or party, is particularly popular. Whoever wins will be little more than, in the eyes of Australians, the leper with the most fingers. Australia tends not to elect heroes; it elects managers.
22 April 2025
3.8 MINS
America’s official COVID website has been overhauled, now spotlighting Fauci’s behind-the-scenes role, confirming the Wuhan lab leak theory, and exposing Biden admin censorship, policy failures, and cover-ups from the pandemic’s darkest days.
22 April 2025
4.3 MINS
Now we learn that the draconian 8 p.m. curfew during the COVID-19 pandemic had absolutely nothing to do with the advice of the medical community. It was simply another heavy-handed bit of tyranny from Dan Andrews.
22 April 2025
2.2 MINS
Recently, debate commenced on the Abortion Law Amendment (Health Care Access) bill which would, amongst other things, further chip away at the freedom of health practitioners to conscientiously object to participating in abortion.
22 April 2025
1.3 MINS
A poem about Judas Iscariot's betrayal of our Lord Jesus Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane.
22 April 2025
2.8 MINS
Australia needs God’s mercy and that He would give us what we don’t deserve: a fresh outpouring of God’s Spirit, leaders who truly honour God, and a turning of the tide towards Him.
