Latham’s Law to Protect Religious Freedom

24 April 2020


I don’t know when it happened precisely, but Mark Latham has become one of the champions of religious freedom in the state of New South Wales. It’s strange, because by his own admission he doesn’t even consider himself ‘religious’. However, the NSW One Nation leader is taking on the ‘thought police’ with a bill to protect free speech online.

For anyone keen to still be able to express their religious point of view online via social media, Latham’s proposed bill offers the much-needed protection. According to Latham’s Facebook post, the Bill will seek to do two main things:

  1. Empower/Make further provisions for the President of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board to decline certain complaints as frivolous or vexatious.
  2. Remove the requirement for the President to refer declined complaints to NCAT (NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal).

In the light of everything that happened to people such as Israel Folau last year, this is a welcome move. Because the Anti-Discrimination Act has been weaponised by certain activists to financially destroy those whom they disagree with. As Latham argued in the NSW Parliament:

Activists are using the legal system to try to score the political points they cannot achieve by democratic means, or even worse, they are using the legal system to try to destroy their opponents financially to break them with the cost of using lawyers and going through tribunals to defend themselves. This is not justice; it is a lawyer’s picnic.

In the four decades since the Anti-Discrimination Act was legislated, the political environment has changed substantially. We now live in an era of heightened political activism, much of it driven by the intense polarised and at times obsessive nature of social media, and tactics such as ‘de-platforming’ and ‘cancelling culture’ have become common.

Bernard Gaynor, a former Major in the Defence Force, is another example of someone who has had to engage in modern “law-fare” to financially defend himself against numerous defamation lawsuits. For example, over the past five years, Mr. Gaynor has had up to 37 complaints brought against him by just one person, who described himself as an “Anti-Discrimination Campaigner”.

Mr Latham has asked the public to issue a long or short submission in support of the bill. (You can do so by clicking here.) Submissions close Sunday 26 April, however due to the coronavirus you can request an extension by emailing:

In response to the proposed Bill, Mr. Gaynor was quoted as saying:

The NSW Anti-Discrimination Board has allowed a vexatious and self-described ‘anti-free speech activist’ to unleash a reign of legal terror on conservatives and Christians.

This body should be abolished and Mark Latham’s common-sense bill to force it to dismiss vexatious complaints is a good first step.

The Anti-Discrimination Board is a totalitarian, state-funded activist organisation that is hell-bent on using the coercive power of the state to silence mainstream conservative opinion.

These types of ‘Thought Police’ should have no place in Australia.

Hear, hear. I mean, “Amen!” I’m still getting used to the use of religious language after a speech by a secular politician. We can thank God though that there’s someone who’s willing to speak up for the many quiet Australians.


We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and big-tech censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate today.



  1. Graham Cartwright 24 April 2020 at 9:55 am - Reply

    Thank you

  2. Greg Spaanderman 24 April 2020 at 11:36 am - Reply

    It is not the first time in world history that the Lord has used people who we would not expect to defend his people. We already see that in the bible where one of the persian kings(i think Cyrus) sent Gods people back to Israel. May God bless the work of Mark Latham so that we can continue to serve God in peace.

  3. Monica Bennett-Ryan 2 May 2020 at 10:42 am - Reply

    Thank you Mark, I love what Mark Latham is trying to do…

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles

  • 29 June 2022

    4 MINS

    Atheists are cheering at the drop in religious affiliation in our nation. However, with Christians becoming a minority, those who have abandoned faith in God have embraced faith in other things -- in modern ideologies. Australian census data released yesterday shows that -- for the [...]

  • 29 June 2022

    7.8 MINS

    We must watch out for the sort of company we keep. It is vital throughout life to be discerning about the friendships we choose to cultivate, if we want to avoid vice and nourish virtue. Too often, bad company leads Christians to compromise our values [...]

  • 29 June 2022

    11.4 MINS

    The fresh anti-discrimination legislation in the Australian Capital Territory will reduce religious freedom even further, applying the strictures upon faith-based schools to other religious institutions like hospitals and aged care, and even places of worship or university student societies. The Australian Capital Territory government has [...]

  • 29 June 2022

    5.1 MINS

    In 1971, America’s largest Protestant denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, passed a pro-abortion resolution. Today, it is one of the most influential proponents of life. What changed? The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) -- according to its website -- is “a collection of like-minded churches working [...]

  • 29 June 2022

    1.5 MINS

    Send this straightforward letter to your local member of parliament today and give a voice to babies in the womb who have no one else to speak up for them. Babies born alive are afforded legal protection in New South Wales, and unborn babies lost [...]

  • 28 June 2022

    6.5 MINS

    Samuel L. Jackson took a potshot at Justice Clarence Thomas, without understanding the legal foundations of his judgement. Here is a cogent summary of the majority opinion's reasoning in the recent Supreme Court case overturning Roe v. Wade. Ever since the Supreme Court in the [...]

  • 28 June 2022

    6.7 MINS

    Was colonisation a wholly evil thing, or has it been, on balance, beneficial for the indigenous peoples of Australia? This question merits serious consideration, as progressives denigrate our monarch and our nation for supplanting the savagery of yore. Not so long ago, it used to [...]