Trump was Right About Malaria Medication and COVID-19

7 July 2020

1.9 MINS

WHO and international governments misled by dodgy scientific research involving anti-malaria drug and COVID-19.

US President Trump has been roundly criticised — and even condemned — for promoting the anti-malarial drug, Hydroxychloroquine, as part of a medical strategy in the fight against COVID-19. In fact, he was mocked by many in the media, such as Stephen Collinson from CNN, who stated that, “Trump peddles unsubstantiated hope in dark times.”

But it now seems like Trump just might have been right after all! Fox News has recently reported that:

Researchers at the Henry Ford Health System in Southeast Michigan have found that early administration of the drug hydroxychloroquine makes hospitalized patients substantially less likely to die.

The study, published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, determined that hydroxychloroquine provided a “66% hazard ratio reduction,” and hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin a 71 percent reduction, compared to neither treatment.

This comes on the back of a special investigation conducted by The Guardian Australia which over a month ago found that:

“The World Health Organization and a number of national governments have changed their Covid-19 policies and treatments on the basis of flawed data from a little-known US healthcare analytics company, also calling into question the integrity of key studies published in some of the world’s most prestigious medical journals.”

The report went on to state:

“A Guardian investigation can reveal the US-based company Surgisphere, whose handful of employees appear to include a science fiction writer and an adult-content model, has provided data for multiple studies on Covid-19 co-authored by its chief executive, but has so far failed to adequately explain its data or methodology.”

As a result of the Guardian Australia’s investigation, the academically-flawed study by Surgisphere has now been formerly retracted. Even Dr Norman Swan, a medical expert for the ABC, has stated on the Coronacast podcast that, “This tiny company does not seem to have the capacity or the personnel to be able to do this.” What’s more, Dr. Swan went on to say:

“If you actually look at what they’re claiming that they’ve done, is that they’ve integrated a huge amount of de-identifying data from patients, which is very hard to do.

A lot of the hospitals that they could have done it from don’t have the capacity to do it.

Hospitals contacted by The Guardian and other organisations have said that they didn’t know anything about Surgisphere and hadn’t handed over their data to them. It just looks very fishy, indeed.

O dear. You really can’t make this stuff up! How can such prestigious and influential publications such as The Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine allow something like this to occur? If the consequences were not so serious, it would be funny. But as Dr David Samadi rightly concluded on Twitter:

SHARE >

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and big-tech censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate today.

DONATE

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles

  • 26 November 2022

    3.7 MINS

    International Men’s Day 2022 was marked by people all over the world on 19 November, demonstrating their support for men and boys everywhere. “I'd like to say a massive thank you and give my support to all the men who do their best each and [...]

    READ MORE
  • 25 November 2022

    5.2 MINS

    To understand the diabolical nature of the Davos deities, read this book. This is not the first book to appear in recent times critiquing the Great Reset, Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and related matters. Some of these volumes I have already reviewed. But [...]

    READ MORE
  • 24 November 2022

    4.7 MINS

    With the ongoing censorship of health professionals, how can we truly trust their medical advice? I was recently accused of lying. This was a little hard to swallow, as it was over a directly referenced quote. At the same time, I found the accusation understandable. [...]

    READ MORE
  • 23 November 2022

    5.2 MINS

    These two terms sound very similar, don’t they? Nothing could be further from the truth. Today I would like to explore their differences, as well as the danger of one and the importance of the other. Critical Theory Critical theory (CT) can be traced back [...]

    READ MORE
  • 23 November 2022

    5.8 MINS

    by Ruth Burgess Is there a dark side to religious environmentalism? Between 6-18th November, the UN climate conference COP27 was held on the Sinai Peninsula in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. What may not be so well-known is that religious leaders from across the three monotheistic [...]

    READ MORE
  • 22 November 2022

    2.1 MINS

    Great Southland Revival, our latest book telling the story of Australia’s many revivals, has been sent to the printers this week! You are invited to join us for the online Prayer Launch this Wednesday, 23rd November, at 8 pm (AEDT), using this Zoom link. As [...]

    READ MORE
  • 22 November 2022

    1 MINS

    Poll determines the former US President should be allowed back on Twitter. Elon Musk announced the day before yesterday that former President Donald Trump will be allowed back on Twitter. Musk made the announcement after conducting an online poll that attracted more than 15 million [...]

    READ MORE