
Does Donald Trump Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?
This is not a headline you’d have expected to read four years ago — or any time during the Trump presidency, for that matter.
But the infamous president once feared an untrustworthy guardian of the nation’s nuclear codes has turned heads this month for quite the opposite reason. Having recently secured three historic peace deals, Trump has now been nominated — not once, but twice — for the Nobel Peace Prize.
The first nomination came from Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian Parliament, who cited Trump’s historic peace deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates. “I think he has done more trying to create peace between nations than most other Peace Prize nominees,” said Tybring-Gjedde, adding that “this agreement could be a game changer that will turn the Middle East into a region of cooperation and prosperity.”
A second nomination followed quickly on its heels when Magnus Jacobsson, a member of the Swedish Parliament, nominated the governments of the United States, Kosovo and Serbia for the prize. In early September, the Trump administration brokered a groundbreaking trade and communications agreement between Kosovo and Serbia, whose relationship has been strained since the Kosovo War of the late 1990s.
The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize will be announced on October 9 — but is Trump a serious contender? Is he deserving of such a distinguished accolade?
To cut to the chase, my answer is that he is more deserving than his predecessor in the White House, who did receive it.
“America First” has been the Trump foreign policy doctrine. Trump’s critics warned this could lead to bloodshed and chaos, but counter-intuitively, “America First” has heralded a time of surprising peace.
Citing crumbling infrastructure back home and too high a cost borne by military families, the Trump administration has made significant troop withdrawals from the Middle East, and held NATO allies accountable for their financial commitments.
The U.S. has also brokered a peace deal between Israel and Bahrain, with reports that the “Abraham Accords” may be expanded to other Arab nations. There are even whispers that the prized Saudi Arabia may be among them.
Achieving what many past presidents have promised but failed to enact, President Trump moved the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. He has negotiated the release of captured Americans from the region. Most significantly, perhaps, he is the first president in four decades not to drag the United States into an international armed conflict.
The response to Trump’s achievements and nominations have fallen along predictably partisan lines. Some have raised legitimate concerns about the plight of the Palestinians in the midst of the Abraham Accords. Others have noted with cynicism the convenient timing of the agreements in the election cycle. U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, for example, called the deals “a distraction” from affairs back home such as COVID-19.
In a particularly sceptical move, just days after Trump’s first nomination, The Atlantic ran a piece entitled “End the Nobel Peace Prize: The Trump nomination shows that peace had its chance, and blew it”. The nomination of Trump was the work of a troll, argued the article, and the prize is subjective anyway — so shut it down before Trump gets it.
Those more sanguine have pointed out that other nominees have won the Nobel Peace Prize for far less than Trump. Yasser Arafat’s award in 1994 has remained a perennial controversy. But even Barack Obama’s in 2009 was an interesting one.
At the time, Obama had been in power for less than eight months. Over the course of the Obama presidency, America’s preeminence in foreign affairs was wound back, and in ways that emboldened the West’s enemies. It was during this era, of course, that ISIS established the first territorial caliphate in centuries, decapitating American journalists and Coptic Christians before a watching world. Iran was another regime that was able to take advantage of Obama’s softer foreign policy approach.
In the Trump era, everything is partisan or is at least seen to be. The same will likely hold true when the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded.
But among other contenders, Trump’s at least appears to be a worthy nomination. If he secures another Middle East deal in the coming weeks — which isn’t entirely outside the realm of possibility — he may just secure the prize, and shore up his election prospects to boot.
Watch this space.
___
Originally published at MercatorNet.
Photo: BigStock
Recent Articles
31 March 2023
3.1 MINS
UNSW Professor Gigi Foster began warning against lockdowns in 2021. Her recent analysis of Australia's approach to COVID-19 yielded far worse results than she had imagined. While Australian governments are yet to provide the public with a cost-benefit analysis of their COVID-era lockdown policies, one [...]
31 March 2023
2.5 MINS
Every time someone apologises for telling the truth, the price of telling the truth rises. There will come a point soon, if we have not reached it already, where speaking the truth is simply too costly. And what becomes of a society in which people [...]
31 March 2023
3.4 MINS
K.I.S.S. (keep it simple, stupid…silly…sweetie)… your choice! I’m sure that you will have heard of this acronym. My friend Warwick Marsh shared another saying of similar ilk a while ago: ‘The main thing is the plain thing, and the plain thing is the main thing.’ [...]
30 March 2023
4.6 MINS
Christians were targeted in the latest mass shooting in America, first by the killer and then by a malevolently dishonest media. The city of Nashville is in mourning after the mass shooting of six locals, three of them children, at The Covenant School in Tennessee [...]
30 March 2023
1.6 MINS
The new misogyny is the old misogyny, but led by men in dresses. ‘Let Women Speak’, they said. Well here’s what happened when a diminutive woman tried to speak in Auckland on Saturday 25 March: Posie Parker was drowned out and attacked by a baying [...]
30 March 2023
3.3 MINS
It’s hard to be satirical when reality is even funnier than the joke. They say that truth is stranger than fiction. But according to Seth Dillon, CEO of America’s largest satire site The Babylon Bee, it is increasingly difficult to see any daylight between the two. [...]
30 March 2023
10.9 MINS
The 'Gates of Hades' (Hades is sometimes called 'hell') which Jesus referred to in Matthew was a physical place (Matt 16:18). It was located in Caesarea Philippi in northern Israel. Yet many theologians agree it was a reference to a spiritual reality as well. The [...]