government overreach

Love Your Neighbour: Speak Up Against Government Overreach

21 August 2021

4.2 MINS

A commonly-repeated criticism since the beginning of 2020 has been that if you prioritise freedom over safety, you are being selfish. In many Christian circles, it is said to be “not loving your neighbour” if you vocally defend freedom. Such ideas continue to circulate, even as heavier lockdowns and curfews are imposed in Victoria, New South Wales and beyond.

But they mostly miss the point. Such criticisms assume that every measure that could be introduced to protect Australians against covid is by definition necessary and good. They seemingly deny the possibility that any cure could be worse than a disease, or that there is such a thing as going too far.

The executive director of the Menzies Research Centre Nick Cater has expressed sensible concerns about this. He argues that good public policy has been near-impossible to implement over this period because fear has overtaken reason in our risk assessments:

We are caught in a feedback loop, a vortex of fear, where politicians can no longer act sensibly because they have to respond to public fear. If they opened up now people would go berserk and say that it’s not safe to go outside…

I have come to the conclusion that the government has lost control. It has to obey this mantra of fear, and as a result of that it takes no risks whatsoever.

This reflects the broader culture of our times, not just in Australia but in the Western world more broadly. Nobody is prepared to put up with the slightest amount of risk. Wherever risk occurs the government has to deal with it.

Consider, for example, that while daily case numbers of covid reached into the hundreds this week in Australia, daily calls to suicide helplines reached into the thousands. Lifeline has had its three busiest days in history since Monday, with up to 3,500 people calling the helpline per day. And that’s just one of many such services available to distressed Australians.

Surely “loving your neighbour” also means being concerned — and indeed, speaking out — about government policies that are inflicting this level of distress. As Christians, we believe that people are not machines that merely require a certain set of material inputs to get through life. We are made in God’s image. We are relational creatures who survive and thrive through active involvement in our communities, and meaningful work and service to others.

Even the World Health Organization recognises this holistic view of health, or at least it did until recently. While we seem to have redefined ‘health’ to mean the absence of sickness, the WHO’s Constitution, drafted in the 1940s, pushed back against this reductionistic view:

Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity… Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.

Of course, covid is deadly. But so are many things — including some of the measures our governments have implemented in the name of ‘health’. We have allowed fear to redefine our most basic understanding of what it means to live and function as a healthy human being.

To protect their health, Australians have been told to not talk to their neighbours, not to engage in outdoor recreation, not to attend church, not to watch sunsets, not to leave home for more than an hour a day. In all this time, we are yet to hear a single public health official or minister promote exercise, good diet, sunlight, weight loss or vitamin supplements. All of these simple, everyday strategies are important aspects of health, and are known to boost our immune systems and reduce our chances of suffering the most debilitating impacts of the virus.

Meanwhile, measurable deadly impacts are now linked to government lockdown policies. Australian data shows an 87 percent increase in couples separating and an 86 percent rise in the number of people seeking help for addiction. Stay at home orders saw NSW chart historic highs in homebound sexual assaults, and Victoria find that one in ten of its citizens contemplated ending their life.

Is this healthy? Is it “loving our neighbour” to stay quiet?

But this is only the beginning of the carnage. The ABC has reported on a “shadow pandemic” of domestic violence during lockdowns, and an uptick in anxiety among school children that has created a “wholly new group of school refusers”.

In the USA, 93,000 Americans died of drug overdoses under lockdowns, the highest level ever recorded. The BBC reported that five times more children died by suicide than from covid under the UK’s strict stay-at-home orders. Japan also recorded record numbers of suicides.

The horrendous list goes on and on. And we haven’t even considered the destruction of small businesses, the loss of income for families, the damage to education for our children, and the soaring national debt. All this and more will result in poorer health outcomes — and therefore, ultimately, more deaths in the long term that are yet to be measured.

And what about all of the politicians and celebrities who have been free to cross domestic and international borders and shirk quarantine, while regular Australians have been barred from the weddings and funerals of their loved ones?

This is why Australia has a parliamentary system. Historically, our laws have been good because they have had to pass muster through two chambers of parliament. Under our current emergency provisions, the rules we now follow are almost entirely the dictates of unelected health bureaucrats which a handful of top politicians simply give the nod to.

Even with the best of intentions, history shows that when leaders have too much power for too long, they become less accountable and more removed from the lives of ordinary people who daily reap the harvest of their rules. The fact that our state and federal ministers have collectively ignored every call for a cut to their six-figure salaries during lockdowns is proof positive of this.

So no, speaking up for freedom is not selfish or unloving. The freedoms long protected in the West are precisely why we have historically enjoyed good health, economic prosperity, strong communities, and all the benefits that flow from these blessings.

When you speak up for freedom and against government overreach, you’re not primarily benefitting yourself — in fact, it may come at quite a personal cost. Your voice matters to those who are suffering, and it can and will make a big difference in this difficult time.

So love your neighbour, and speak up for freedom.

[Photo by Claudia Wolff on Unsplash]


We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and big-tech censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate today.



  1. Stephen Adams 22 August 2021 at 3:13 pm - Reply

    Wonderful article. Thanks Kurt. Couldn’t agree more.

  2. David Findlay 23 August 2021 at 3:27 pm - Reply

    So speaking up against DV, Child abuse, systemic racism, the needs of the homeless, you remain silent about, but lockdowns, which does include loving your neighbour, because you’re sacrificing for the wellbeing of others and lowering the hospital rate, that’s something to speak against. You’re singing form the song sheet of antivaxxers, conspiracy theorists and the mega rich who want things to open up so they can continue to profit from others.

  3. Paul newell 27 August 2021 at 8:12 pm - Reply

    Thank you for writing this. I agree with you but disagree with Nick Cater you quoted saying governments are responding to fear. He is too kind. Governments began promoting fear and continue to this day. Fear is now known to be (Pfizer 6 month study) the second most dangerous co- morbidity for covid death. Very sinister how governments around the world united to shun early treatment which now we know reduces hospitalisation.

  4. Jeanie 29 August 2021 at 6:44 pm - Reply

    Thanks so much for your great articles Kurt!
    I’ve really enjoyed them!

  5. Melinda Rau-Wig 3 September 2021 at 3:22 am - Reply

    KURT, yes the Government silence on suicide is so concerning…

    Praise the Lord – for this Outreach and the beautiful work of The Canberra Declaration, Australia Prays and the support services – Lifeline – and the many others.

    I was awoken last year @ 3am (constant occurrence for Prayer)
    However. this time, it was with a call to go down (we’re upstairs) and check on our highly anxious 19yr old son – we live in The Police State of Victoria.

    Our darling son, was beside himself, incoherent, ready to do what it would take, to remove himself from the lockdown situation ie: take his life in some way, shape or form…

    Our Mighty God was able to lead him out of this situation in a very practical way as he wasn’t ready to hear anything about Our Loving Father (just he like his Father – is an avowed atheist – but they have both Christian upbringings and I know God has a Mighty Plan for them).

    When the example, that while daily case numbers of covid reach into 100’s, the daily calls to suicide helplines reached into 1,000’s……Government policies that are inflicting this level of distress must be NOT only questioned but removed immediately.

    People must also begin to do their own legal research – How many of these policies are Constitutional?

    Love & Blessings in Jesus Mighty Name,

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles

  • 28 November 2022

    2.7 MINS

    It’s almost a given today that masculinity is viewed as being a negative and even harmful thing. The most common adjective which is used to describe someone who is overly masculine is that it is ‘toxic’. Due to the impact of the fall, sin has [...]

  • 28 November 2022

    3.5 MINS

    Bad news in Victoria -- yet, though earthly governments may fail, we look to our eternal hope in the Lord. Saturday night was not a good one for Christians, for conservatives, and for those who value freedom, family and other key values. The short story [...]

  • 25 November 2022

    2.9 MINS

    Bestselling Christian novelist Stephen Lawhead's Roman retelling of King Arthur is being prepped for the big screen. Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing announced a multi-film adaption of the six-book series, The Pendragon Cycle, during what is the conservative media company’s equivalent of a state of [...]

  • 25 November 2022

    5.2 MINS

    To understand the diabolical nature of the Davos deities, read this book. This is not the first book to appear in recent times critiquing the Great Reset, Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and related matters. Some of these volumes I have already reviewed. But [...]

  • 24 November 2022

    6.6 MINS

    There is a lot of encouraging material to be found in this chapter of Scripture. We are called to share the Gospel with others. The Apostle Paul told us that ‘all scripture is… profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness’ [...]

  • 23 November 2022

    5.2 MINS

    These two terms sound very similar, don’t they? Nothing could be further from the truth. Today I would like to explore their differences, as well as the danger of one and the importance of the other. Critical Theory Critical theory (CT) can be traced back [...]

  • 23 November 2022

    5.8 MINS

    by Ruth Burgess Is there a dark side to religious environmentalism? Between 6-18th November, the UN climate conference COP27 was held on the Sinai Peninsula in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. What may not be so well-known is that religious leaders from across the three monotheistic [...]