The Indian state of Uttar Pradesh provides us with undeniable evidence that Ivermectin can help in the fight against COVID-19. While only six percent of its population were vaccinated, the drug helped Uttar Pradesh to reach zero percent COVID-19 cases.
Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy, a mucosal specialist at the forefront of COVID treatment and a firm advocate of Ivermectin as an alternative treatment for the virus, has had his radio interview on the subject banned by government authorities.
Yet the evidence below presents a very strong case that the overturning of the ban on Ivermectin should be supported by those with influence — including the Australian Medical Association (AMA), the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Among that evidence is the Indian Bar Association (IBA) suing the World Health Organisation (WHO), and Dr John Campbell’s excellent explanation of Ivermectin’s effectiveness.
Why is the corporate media ignoring the Indian Bar Association v WHO case, and the situation in Uttar Pradesh, whose population of 240 million now has almost no COVID cases? The remainder of this article and the two compelling videos below provide the answer. Cumulatively, they establish the efficacy of what is called ‘Ivermectin/Triple Therapy’, an early treatment course including the use of Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline.
Triple-Drug COVID Treatment in Uttar Pradesh
Significantly, Ivermectin/Triple Therapy was widely and effectively distributed as part of a home kit across Uttar Pradesh for COVID-19 patients.
Why then has Australia banned Ivermectin?
Clearly not because it is too expensive: these kits cost $2.50 per course in India. Nor because it is too dangerous: on the contrary, Triple Therapy is vastly safer than paracetamol. Perhaps it is because the treatment is too effective, and, consequently, is seen as a threat to the national vaccination program.
Regardless of what the authorities say, early treatment is a vital way to support the vaccination program. It is not designed to replace it.
Moreover, Triple Therapy can be used by both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. It is effective in reducing morbidity, lessening the length of infection, reducing hospitalisation, and saving lives.
Most importantly, this treatment can be used to help build up herd immunity in a safe manner for the long-term benefit of all.
How Ivermectin Can Help Herd Immunity
Never has government intervention so negatively invaded the sacred rights of the GP-patient relationship.
Traditionally, therapeutic discussions between doctor and patient have covered the benefits, harms and alternatives of all possible treatments (regardless of the situation in question). Today, however, doctors are being pressured by the government and major medical bodies to sideline such discussions.
Worse still, any discussion about the potential side effects or long-term risks of the COVID vaccine is considered ‘radicalism’ by the government-backed medical establishment.
In the short term, the COVID vaccination program will undoubtedly be vital in saving lives, particularly in the elderly and vulnerable. Nonetheless, to develop herd immunity that will be effective enough to protect the whole population in the future, natural herd immunity is a critical ingredient. This appears to have been achieved in Uttar Pradesh already.
Natural immunity could realistically be attained in the under-40s population. It could also possibly be attained in those aged up to 60 (provided they are healthy), if it is supported by effective early Triple Therapy.
In contrast to Uttar Pradesh, consider overseas cases such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Israel, Iceland and Singapore, where herd immunity is not developing, despite high vaccination rates. In fact, quite distressingly, cases are on the increase.
Unless they change their policies, these countries are surrendering to a regime of repeated vaccinations. Furthermore, the vaccines being used have unknown long-term safety outcomes. All this for an illness that has now been deemed by both Norway and Denmark to be more equivalent to influenza in its seriousness.
To add further evidence to the case for early treatment, experienced American experts at a recent global summit in San Juan all agreed that “the key to everything is early treatment”.
The Research on Early Treatment and Ivermectin
US physicians at the forefront of both research and treating patients firmly believe we can control the pandemic through effective early treatment. The best early treatment to date is Triple Therapy, which includes Ivermectin. To quote Pierre Kory, M.D., a world-renowned intensive care specialist:
“We are in a pandemic of undertreatment, long-haul Covid and hospitalizations are caused by undertreatment and a lack of an effective prevention strategy. If you institute systematically early treatment upon first symptoms, the amount of people who would require hospital would go away. The amount of transmissions would go away”.
Richard Urso, M.D., a scientist, and the sole inventor of an FDA-approved wound healing drug, has said, “We’re vaccinating in a very narrow framework, so when you vaccinate just the spike, you’re going to get variants, because we are doing a very specific treatment.”
He also plainly stated that those who have recovered from COVID “have no reason to get the vaccine as they have a near-zero chance of getting reinfected”.
We have numerous experienced experts all agreeing that vaccinations are appropriate in the elderly and vulnerable, but that “the key to everything is early treatment”.
For further reading on this topic, see When Coronavirus Facts Contradict the Narrative, Change the Facts by Professor Ramesh Thakur, and 30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet.
Unanswered Questions About Ivermectin in Australia
This discussion raises a raft of questions about Australia’s response to the pandemic — in particular, the Australian Government’s attitude towards Ivermectin.
Why didn’t the WHO acknowledge that Ivermectin was in the Indian home kits? Why does the TGA approve unproven medications at $2000 per dose with little safety data while simultaneously banning Ivermectin?
Why does the AMA and the RACGP still promote disinformation on Ivermectin? Why is Brett Sutton allowed to demonise Ivermectin? Sutton’s remarks betray his complete ignorance when compared the opinions of authentic world health experts who have been at the forefront of COVID treatment and research.
The Australian Government should follow the example set by Uttar Pradesh and supply everyone who tests positive to COVID-19 with an early treatment kit that includes Ivermectin, Doxycycline and zinc.
This could be achieved at negligible cost ($2.50 in India, and likely around $25.00 in Australia). Importantly, the kit should be utilised at the earliest onset of symptoms.
In the US, some have claimed that Triple Therapy has effectively reduced hospitalisations, morbidity and mortality by 85 per cent or more.
Professor Thomas Borody has conducted trials showing up to 100 per cent survival. So why wait?
This is an emergency and needs to be implemented now by the Australian Government. Australia has everything to gain and nothing to lose by following this protocol.
It is Not Too Late
The situation we are in is something to behold. We have allowed health devastation caused by continued lockdowns, community breakdown, economic catastrophe, and social division that has torn families and friends apart and pitted employers against employees.
What has it all been for?
A disease with a mortality rate of 0.25%-0.5%, akin to a severe influenza season. And in which both morbidity and mortality could be further reduced to average seasonal winter levels of influenza by early Triple Therapy.
Perhaps the saddest aspect of it all is how much was ultimately unnecessary: lockdowns, mask-wearing and mass PCR testing could have been avoided if we had treated COVID-19 as another virus that can be dealt with by early treatment.
And perhaps the greatest irony is that this early treatment was first discovered in Melbourne and then pioneered by our own world-renowned Professor Borody.
Borody first brought this treatment to light seventeen months ago. That his findings have still not been acted upon is an indictment on our medical profession which did not rally around him when he first announced his discovery.
He deserves much more respect and credit than he has received. Borody is the world’s foremost expert on Triple Therapy and the pioneer of Triple Therapy for helicobacter/stomach ulcers, now considered the worldwide best practice.
Instead, we have listened to health bureaucrats with vested interests, other regular commentators, and mainstream epidemiologists whose modelling have been consistently and wildly off the mark. And for the final insult, we now have self-interested politicians and governments interfering in the sacrosanct doctor-patient relationship telling us how we should and shouldn’t practice medicine!
We had the most enviable living standards and a great health system, and could realistically have been a western version of Uttar Pradesh. Alas, that chance has been spurned. In fact, we have done the opposite, with our zealous and draconian policies harming this wonderful country.
We still have an opportunity to improve the situation. It is not to late for common sense to prevail.
Personal Message from author Dr Guy Campbell:
For the first time in thirty-five years, I feel threatened because if I want to continue to practice medicine to the best of my abilities by wisely using the best of the science possible with both vaccinations and early triple therapy, I potentially face deregistration. This is causing immense stress on my family, my work colleagues, my patients, and myself. I am privileged to both be privy to Professor Thomas Borody’s work and to have a highly academic team of Professors in support. It would have been morally wrong for me not to speak up.
Image by Matteo Jorjoson on Unsplash.