Johnny Depp

The Johnny Depp Trial: A Loss For #MeToo, But a Win For Blind Justice

20 June 2022

2.8 MINS

Hopefully, the Depp trial will be a clarion call for the presumption of innocence and for objectivity to apply once again in cases of abuse allegations. Those who make false accusations are guilty of abuse themselves, and should not be tolerated or encouraged. They need to be held accountable for their lies.

The genderisation of justice is the most unfortunate, though perhaps the most inevitable outcome of the #MeToo and #BelieveAllWomen movements.

Recently, those hashtag crusades suffered a major setback with a Virginia jury awarding actor Johnny Depp US$15 million in damages for defamation by his ex-wife, Amber Heard, who falsely accused him of sexual violence in a 2018 Washington Post op-ed.

The trial, which began on April 12 and lasted six weeks, also saw Heard awarded US$2 million for a defamation claim regarding false statements made by Depp’s lawyer.

Media Spin

Reactions in the legacy press and on social media were, predictably, divided.

Unable to fully face up to a Depp victory, Twitter spun the story in its ‘What’s Happening’ bar as “Jury finds both Amber Heard and Johnny Depp were defamed after weeks-long trial”. Mainstream outlets were more honest, conceding that Depp prevailed, even as petulant protests filled their opinion columns.

While gender-obsessed commentators will paint the Johnny Depp trial as a win for men and a loss for women, it is in fact a win for justice and a loss for partiality.

All women making allegations of sexual assault should be taken seriously. But not all such women should be believed simply because they are women. This fact is as self-evidently true as the statement that not all white people should be believed when making criminal accusations against those of a minority race.

Justice can only be just as long as courts try defendants as individuals rather than as members of a collective.


Heard had hoped that her gender would bend the law in her favour. “I’m even more disappointed in what this verdict means for other women,” she wrote in a statement following the verdict.

Depp, on the other hand, was thankful that justice was gender-blind, writing in his post-trial statement, “I hope that my quest to have the truth be told will have helped others, men or women, who have found themselves in my situation.”

Lady justice is blind for a reason. The principle that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty is what sets Western jurisprudence apart from the mob justice and corruption characteristic of other times in history and other societies still today.

Amber Heard’s case floundered not on account of her gender but the evidence weighed by the jury. Speaking to the New York Post, former California judge Halim Dhanidina — whose clients have included actors, directors and writers — said the jury found Heard to be “either inauthentic, overacting or not deserving of empathy.”

“A lot of Heard’s emotional cues on the witness stand didn’t line up with her testimony,” Dhanidina told the Post. “She would get very impassioned at weird times or make awkward attempts to connect with the jury by speaking to them directly.”

It also appears to have hurt Heard’s case that she failed to keep her story straight, and that her allegation about Depp throwing his ex-girlfriend Kate Moss down a set of stairs was refuted by Moss herself in the witness stand.

Prematurely Cancelled

Then there were the leaked audio recordings in which Heard taunted Depp to go public about the mutual violence in their relationship and “see what the jury and judge thinks”. “Tell the world, Johnny, tell them, Johnny Depp, I Johnny Depp, a man, I’m a victim too of domestic violence,” she jeered. “See how many people believe or side with you.”

Heard got her wish — and the world will remember it as the day she almost caught Captain Jack Sparrow.

What now for the woke outfits that de facto defamed Depp before the lawsuit was heard? In a classic case of cancel culture, Disney dumped Depp from their Pirates of the Caribbean franchise in the rising tide of Heard’s accusations.

Worse, the ACLU ghost-wrote the Washington Post op-ed for Heard, after she promised to pay them US$7 million for their troubles. Both the ACLU and WaPo are doubtless bracing hard for legal action.

God willing, the entire saga serves as a cultural reset for blind justice and the presumption of innocence.


Originally published at MercatorNet.


We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and big-tech censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate today.


Leave A Comment

Recent Articles

  • 12 August 2022

    2.8 MINS

    Editor's Note: Writing in News Weekly, former President of the National Civic Council Peter Westmore points out the erroneous claims made by the Minister for the Environment which will infect national policy, further eroding our agricultural and fishing industries. ___ Unveiling the “State of the [...]

  • 12 August 2022

    3.7 MINS

    Secular attempts to force inclusivity upon everyone are anything but inclusive. Why is this so? Let us examine the underlying assumptions of this totalitarian worldview. Inclusivity has become a hot topic of conversation since the Manly Sea Eagles Pride Jersey Saga. The Manly NRL club [...]

  • 11 August 2022

    3 MINS

    Is it unfair for "trans-women" to be excluded from lesbian-only events? Or do lesbians' rights come first? Equality Tasmania insists it’s only fair that men who identify as women have access to lesbians. The lobby group put out a statement yesterday in response to a [...]

  • 9 August 2022

    2.4 MINS

    Flight-tracking apps expose how celebrities and tech billionaires merely pay lip service to the "climate change emergency", creating unnecessary emissions while criticising ordinary folk for not doing enough to stave off global warming. Jack Sweeney, a 19-year-old computer programmer, has become the subject of ire [...]

  • 9 August 2022

    1.4 MINS

    Why is it all right to provide Australian coal for Ukrainian consumption, but terrible if we burn it for domestic energy production? Environmental activism has produced some puzzling double standards. Australia has gifted Ukraine 70,000 tonnes of coal to provide electricity to the war-torn nation. [...]

  • 8 August 2022

    5 MINS

    Editor's Note: Former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General Ramesh Thakur writes at the Brownstone Institute about how an unhealthy fear of COVID-19 has enveloped governments across the world. ___ I’ve had two big worries during the pandemic, starting from the very beginning and still ongoing. Both [...]

  • 8 August 2022

    3.1 MINS

    Editor's Note: This article by Marjorie Jackson of the Washington Stand outlines the importance of upholding a child's right to a relationship with both of their biological parents. ___ “Making husbands and wives optional in marriage would make mothers and fathers optional in parenthood.” As [...]