Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

Medical professionals, politicians and others gathered recently to voice their concerns about the way the coronavirus outbreak has been handled, particularly in regard to vaccine mandates and the suppression of alternative treatment options despite clear evidence. Public health policy has been overtaken by ideology and big business, eroding the basic rights of doctors and patients.

The recent Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) medico-legal summit hosted a panel of eminent experts including professors, associate professors, consultant specialists, PhDs and a lawyer, discussing the public health and safety issues presently resulting from interpretations of the Health Regulation National Law and how proposed amendments are likely to further impact on our ability to provide evidence-based best practice, informed consent and maintain the sacred doctor-patient relationship.

Health professionals are being persecuted for their loyalty and belief in codes of conduct predicated on the Hippocratic Oath, the Declaration of Geneva, and the International Code of Ethics. They have made commitments to serving the community, their patients, and to do no harm.

The immediate action clauses and proposed new amendments, rather than protecting public health, safety and confidence, pose a threat to public health. Rather than our patients being our primary concern, adherence to public health messaging is the new accepted professional standard of “best practice”.

In light of the failings, AMPS seeks legislative amendments to the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Therapeutic Goods Act. The legislative amendments contained within the Declaration and Urgent Demands are vital for protecting the health and safety of all Australians, while securing rights for health practitioners to function without undue interference, being a package of reforms that will implement safeguards preventing government and agency overreach, witnessed during the time of Covid. For more information and to support the declaration and urgent demands please click here.

AMPS believes these amendments are a threat to transparent evidence-based health care as the amendments, such as the making of public statement clauses, will further enforce silence through threats to public shaming, empowering AHPRA to be a single-minded enforcer of government policy, rather than a regulator of safe, effective and trustworthy professional practice. This makes politicians the primary concern of health practitioners across the country, not the individualised care of their patients. We cannot allow such government intrusion to stand.

Vaccine Concerns

Gene-based vaccines are not normal vaccines. They are experimental, novel, under-tested and producing high rates of injuries.

They use a completely new technology, which has only been previously used in severe life-threatening illnesses where there was a perceived potential benefit-risk response.

Nothing is known about their long-term effects, hence Covid-19 experimental mRNA vaccines constitute the largest biological experiment in human history. Until we have long-term safety data, no one can claim they are safe.

All mortality data from official UK, EU and US databases indicate a positive correlation with Covid-19 gene-based vaccine rollouts during 2021 and increased life insurance payouts. Israel, the most vaccinated country in the world, has record numbers of cardiac health issues in the younger population and the US forces have a 10x increase in registered diagnosis episodes following mRNA vaccinations.

German pathologists have described pathological aggregates of spike proteins and lymphocyte infiltrations in inflamed organs in autopsies related to deaths post-vaccination.

Pfizer’s short-term phase 3 clinical trials are now under a cloud of fraud and mismanagement allegations.

The vaccines are not as safe or effective as we were told. They do not stop you from catching or spreading Covid, and research shows that the triple-vaccinated are more likely to get covid compared to the unvaccinated. Furthermore, the more you vaccinate, the greater the risk of desensitising and weakening the immune system.

The benefit-risk ratios vary tremendously with age and do not justify the widescale use of these “vaccines”, especially in the “Omicron variants” where the infection fatality rate is approximately 1/3 of seasonal flu, and when natural immunity (blindingly ignored by the CDC and our various Governments) is more protective than Covid mRNA “vaccinations”.

Censored

Getting vaccinated is not the only way out of the pandemic.

There were safe alternatives and inexpensive proven early treatments (e.g. widespread Ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc triple therapy used in Uttar Pradesh) together with traditional safe vaccine technology, all appearing suppressed by Big Pharma in Western Nations.

Governments used behaviour modification and ‘nudge’ public-relation strategies to increase compliance.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) intimidated health professionals with deregistration if they diverted from the narrative. Scientific information at odds with The Narrative was censored and risk/benefit debate was closed down.

Businesses became proxies to roll out the vaccines by coercive industrial relations sanctions. Rules were set for what could and could not be said in mainstream media and freedom of speech was lost.

The sacred doctor-patient relationship has been destroyed by government intrusion and mandated vaccinations.

Most of all, children have great immune systems and the vast majority already have Sars Cov 2 antibodies. Data from the UK’s Office Of National Statistics (27/6/22) shows that 82% of primary school children have SARS Cov 2 antibodies, all but 0.4% from natural immunity. In 2-year-old children, 99.7% have Sars Cov 2 antibodies, with 34.4% unvaccinated and 64.9 % vaccinated (the majority of which have natural immunity too).

This alone calls for an urgent review of the vaccination policy which was introduced in an emergency, especially now that there is proven negligible benefit in this age group because of the changing risk analysis. How can anyone justify experimental mRNA injections without any robust safety data or clinical benefits for an infection with a 99.995% recovery rate in their age bracket? This is a massive failure of duty of care. The benefits simply don’t outweigh the risks, as verified by the more rational health agencies in Europe.

Finally, a few weeks back, at the World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, even Bill Gates acknowledged (no doubt in preparing his defence and next strategy) that

1. The Covid vaccines do not block infection and the duration of whatever protection they bring to the table is extremely short.
2. The absurdity of implementing any Covid passport program.

If Bill Gates is saying this openly at the WEF, why are Australian state governments mandating health professionals and aged care workers must still be vaccinated against Covid?

___

Photo by Gustavo Fring.