Israel Folau and the Fight for Freedom
16 December 2019
2.8 MINS
Back in 2017 I flew down to Tasmania to interview the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Hobart, Julian Porteous. The Archbishop had been brought before the Anti-Discrimination Board simply for producing a booklet outlining the traditional Christian understanding of marriage.
But the real reason I went was because—even before a decision on same-sex marriage had been reached—I could see that what was ultimately at stake was the issue of religious freedom. And now, only a couple of years later, that ‘threat’ has become a reality.
Israel Folau is now being sued by the gay political activist — and serial litigant — Gary Burns for ‘homosexual vilification’. This is despite the fact that Folau has been given an official apology by Rugby Australia. In case you’ve been living under a rock, or maybe just coming out of a medically-induced coma, this is what Folau had posted:
Interestingly, there have been no liars, fornicators, drunkards, adulterers, thieves, atheists or idolaters who have decided to take a similar course of action. Which is all the more significant when one considers that there are proportionally far more people that fit into one of these seven categories then there are who identify as being LGBTIQ+. In fact, looking again at the list, it includes absolutely everyone!
But there’s a connection between what Burns is doing to Folau now and what happened to Archbishop Porteous down in Hobart. And that is, the process is the punishment. Because the goal is not that the complainant will win, but it’s that you will go broke merely trying to defend yourself against them. Just ask Bernard Gaynor, who has had a staggering thirty-six complaints made against him by Burns and has even had to sell his house to finance his legal costs.
You see, as far as the law is concerned, Mr. Burns doesn’t really have a case. The legislation is already there giving people the freedom to form a different point of view on the basis of religious teaching. As Mark Latham tweeted:
NSW Anti-Discrimination Board decision to persecute Israel Folau is chilling for all religious preachers/freedoms.
Section 49ZT of the Act has an exemption from ‘Homosexual vilification’ action for ‘religious instruction’, discussion, debate and ‘expositions of any act or matter’— Real Mark Latham (@RealMarkLatham) December 13, 2019
What Latham is pointing out here is absolutely spot on. And the specific terminology that he is using is also just as important. Because the strategy of suing people into silence is part of a larger legal approach called the ‘chilling effect’. It’s what Wikipedia defines as “…the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat of legal sanction.”
Do you think any other denominational leader in Tasmania has produced a booklet on marriage since what happened to Porteous? Or has any other sporting celebrity been brave enough to post anything on social media similar to Israel Folau? That’s what the chilling effect achieves! And it is incredibly effective…
Maybe we should all change our Facebook profiles to Israel’s original post? Not to be offensive, but to prevent ourselves from being frozen out of the current situation. For make no mistake, this is not the end of the fight but rather, only the beginning. And it’s only a matter of time before the political activists catch up with you or me.
___
Photo: David Molloy, Wikimedia Commons.
Recent Articles:
7 November 2025
5.4 MINS
New York City has chosen its next mayor. But even as the Australian media heaps praise on Zohran Mamdani, the Muslim socialist’s victory speech betrayed his radical agenda for the world’s most influential city.
7 November 2025
5.4 MINS
Australia is experiencing a significant shift in its view of morality. The “gay conversion therapy” laws now Australia-wide are the exemplar of this. The prevailing narrative grounded in mechanistic thinking has abandoned God and the ethical code embodied in a Christian worldview.
7 November 2025
5.6 MINS
Income splitting is a type of family tax policy that treats the family, rather than the individual, as the basis of taxation. It allows couples to pool and then split their incomes for tax purposes, thus reducing the tax paid on the highest earning partner.
7 November 2025
3.5 MINS
Apart from implementing a "hard firewall" — like the Chinese, and even that is not 100% impenetrable — there is simply no way for the Australian government to actually implement their new age-verification legislation in any meaningful way.
6 November 2025
1.9 MINS
Each of us faces giants in life: fears, trials, temptations, griefs, and struggles that seem insurmountable. Yet the same God who strengthened David strengthens us. We may feel small and unprepared, but He equips us with “stones” of faith, prayer, Scripture, and perseverance.
6 November 2025
7.9 MINS
America’s experiment in liberty was possible only because of a Christian moral imagination that valued virtue over license and truth over power. But as that moral foundation weakens, the nation risks forgetting what made it both free and good.
6 November 2025
4.9 MINS
Faith leaders and academics have warned that a Victorian inquiry into “cults” risks undermining religious freedom, blurring lines between coercion and devotion, and potentially targeting mainstream faith communities.
