
Israel Folau and the Fight for Freedom
Back in 2017 I flew down to Tasmania to interview the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Hobart, Julian Porteous. The Archbishop had been brought before the Anti-Discrimination Board simply for producing a booklet outlining the traditional Christian understanding of marriage.
But the real reason I went was because—even before a decision on same-sex marriage had been reached—I could see that what was ultimately at stake was the issue of religious freedom. And now, only a couple of years later, that ‘threat’ has become a reality.
Israel Folau is now being sued by the gay political activist — and serial litigant — Gary Burns for ‘homosexual vilification’. This is despite the fact that Folau has been given an official apology by Rugby Australia. In case you’ve been living under a rock, or maybe just coming out of a medically-induced coma, this is what Folau had posted:
Interestingly, there have been no liars, fornicators, drunkards, adulterers, thieves, atheists or idolaters who have decided to take a similar course of action. Which is all the more significant when one considers that there are proportionally far more people that fit into one of these seven categories then there are who identify as being LGBTIQ+. In fact, looking again at the list, it includes absolutely everyone!
But there’s a connection between what Burns is doing to Folau now and what happened to Archbishop Porteous down in Hobart. And that is, the process is the punishment. Because the goal is not that the complainant will win, but it’s that you will go broke merely trying to defend yourself against them. Just ask Bernard Gaynor, who has had a staggering thirty-six complaints made against him by Burns and has even had to sell his house to finance his legal costs.
You see, as far as the law is concerned, Mr. Burns doesn’t really have a case. The legislation is already there giving people the freedom to form a different point of view on the basis of religious teaching. As Mark Latham tweeted:
NSW Anti-Discrimination Board decision to persecute Israel Folau is chilling for all religious preachers/freedoms.
Section 49ZT of the Act has an exemption from ‘Homosexual vilification’ action for ‘religious instruction’, discussion, debate and ‘expositions of any act or matter’— Real Mark Latham (@RealMarkLatham) December 13, 2019
What Latham is pointing out here is absolutely spot on. And the specific terminology that he is using is also just as important. Because the strategy of suing people into silence is part of a larger legal approach called the ‘chilling effect’. It’s what Wikipedia defines as “…the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat of legal sanction.”
Do you think any other denominational leader in Tasmania has produced a booklet on marriage since what happened to Porteous? Or has any other sporting celebrity been brave enough to post anything on social media similar to Israel Folau? That’s what the chilling effect achieves! And it is incredibly effective…
Maybe we should all change our Facebook profiles to Israel’s original post? Not to be offensive, but to prevent ourselves from being frozen out of the current situation. For make no mistake, this is not the end of the fight but rather, only the beginning. And it’s only a matter of time before the political activists catch up with you or me.
___
Photo: David Molloy, Wikimedia Commons.
Recent Articles:
18 June 2026
3.6 MINS
History was made last night. Last night showed that the pro-life movement is capable not merely of resisting change, but of advancing its own positive vision for the protection of human life.
18 June 2026
4.2 MINS
Pauline Hanson has delivered her first formal address to the National Press Club of Australia, outling her positions on everything from immigration and energy to Islamism and transgenderism.
18 June 2026
3 MINS
Earlier this month, Robbie Katter introduced a disallowance motion seeking to halt the LNP’s regulation change to allow midwives to prescribe the abortion pill. One issue sits at the very heart of the matter — that Health Minister Tim Nicholls failed to address.
18 June 2026
2.5 MINS
Hanson accused Labor, the Liberals and the Greens of each refusing to “articulate the biological truth” about sex and gender, and named ACON as “the leading advocate of transgenderism in Australia”.
18 June 2026
4.5 MINS
In 2022, Australia recorded 18,398 adverse event reports following Covid-19 vaccination. Of these, 160 involved a fatal outcome. Six of the reported deaths occurred in children aged 0 to 17. Why were none of the reported child deaths escalated for expert investigation?
17 June 2026
2.4 MINS
Family First’s National Director Lyle Shelton described Sarah Game as “one of the strongest and most courageous advocates for families in any Australian parliament”.
17 June 2026
4.6 MINS
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters has refused demands to apologise, delete posts, or donate to a LGBT+ activist group, stating that they are “on the wrong side of history” in a viral post that has been viewed over 1.7 million times in less than one day.





