
Smell the Diversity. Feel the Inclusion.
Manly’s flirtation with wokeball ends in a mess. The officials gave lip service to diversity, but really sought uniformity with modern secular norms.
“It’ll be an inclusion game,” they said. “It’ll celebrate diversity,” they promised.
And so it was.
Except that the Manly Sea Eagles forgot to include their players when they planned it. And they assumed uniformity of thought among the playing group when they announced it.
The rugby league team bosses had been so busy congratulating themselves on their upcoming diversity pageant that they never noticed the diversity within their own dressing room.
Half the team were committed Christians, holding to a biblical view of sexuality. Who knew? Not the doyens of diversity at club headquarters who assumed everyone thought alike.
But worse, this was not the kind of diversity Manly officials had in mind when they planned their diversity parade against the Sydney Roosters.
To borrow a line from George Orwell’s Animal Farm: LBGTQ+ diversity good. Christian diversity bad.
Men of Principle
It seemed the Christian players didn’t want to promote homosexuality and transgenderism and whatever it was that the + represented.
To be clear, the Christian players weren’t objecting to playing alongside LGBTQ+ people, they just didn’t want to wear the rainbow — a Christian symbol now culturally appropriated by homosexuals to promote licentiousness.
And so Manly’s demonstration of diversity was now threatened by a handful of independent thinkers.
Why couldn’t the players who thought differently just get on board with the program, so that the club could go ahead and promote its willingness to embrace difference?
The last thing club management needed, when they were trying to showcase their love of diversity, was an assortment of beliefs.
A solution was at hand, though.
The club could choose, because of their commitment to inclusion and diversity, to stick with their traditional jumper. That would allow the entire team, in all its diversity, to be included in the game.
But not so fast.
How — without forcing other people to run around in rainbow jerseys under threat of being sidelined from the sport they love – would the suits in head office show off their virtuous commitment to inclusion and diversity?
It quickly became clear that the club could only demonstrate their love of inclusion by excluding half their players.
And so they did.
With those who thought differently successfully culled from the group, the Manly Sea Eagles were in a position to show off their diversity.

It was a tough sell. But coach Des Hasler did his best.
His 10-minute address to journalists — during which he used the words “diversity” and “inclusion” six times each, along with generous sprinklings of “tolerance”, eight apologises and a quote from Gandhi no less — seemed to do the trick.
As long as you didn’t think of the excluded players being excluded, Manly stood for inclusion.
And as long as you ignored the players unable to take the field because of their religious beliefs, rugby league was for absolutely everybody.
Look! A rainbow!
Threats
Meanwhile, police were warning the exiled Christian players to stay away from the game that was for absolutely everybody, because of fears for their safety.
According to news reports:
‘There were even fears protesters angry at the players’ stance could attempt to enter the ground and harass the seven stars. It was unanimously agreed the players would be told to stay at home.’
Just imagine if Manly wasn’t an inclusive club!

National Rugby League boss Peter V’landys told journalists that he respected the beliefs of Christian players.
But then he went on to caricature those beliefs:
‘If you don’t want to be inclusive and you don’t recognise that we’re all human beings and we’re all the same, well you have the right to stand down and not play.’
So inclusion and diversity round at the football boils down to this: it doesn’t matter how you actually behave toward other people — if you fail to wear the prescribed rainbow jumper promoting all things LGBTQ+, then you are guilty of inhumanity toward your fellow man.
Imagine how the seven players — sheltering in their homes from angry fans demanding they ditch their Christian principles in order to prove how inclusive everyone else is — must have felt hearing that.
We celebrate diversity, unless your diversity differs from the uniformity of popular culture, in which case we condemn your diversity as bigotry, because we were never really after diversity in the first place.
Can’t you just feel the inclusion?
___
Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo: Charlie Bakhos
Recent Articles:
17 April 2026
2.9 MINS
Trump's critics keep mistaking provocation for prophecy. But the man himself has never claimed to be anything more than a sinner trying — and failing — to get into heaven.
16 April 2026
1.3 MINS
The tired claim that science and faith are at odds ignores a rich history of Christian scientists — and a rather unscientific leap of its own.
16 April 2026
5.3 MINS
Not all discrimination is created equal. Making wise distinctions — in life, love, and national policy — is common sense, not bigotry.
16 April 2026
2.6 MINS
Lionel Richie brought more than music to American Idol's Songs of Faith — he delivered a raw, heartfelt call to prayer and a candid reflection on faith, culture, and humanity.
16 April 2026
5.1 MINS
How could Australia be suffering a double energy crisis when the nation exports several times more energy than it consumes and far more than the United States, which has no energy crisis? Looking to the U.S., what needs to be done to ensure Australia’s energy security?
15 April 2026
4.2 MINS
Donald Trump recently published a picture on Truth Social—which has since been deleted—in which he is clearly presented being someone like Jesus Christ. It’s impossible not to view this as being anything but blasphemy, and hence it’s only right that he since deleted it.
15 April 2026
2.6 MINS
A rare cross-party coalition of Conservatives, the NDP, and Greens opposed the bill — but couldn’t stop the Liberals and Bloc Québécois from passing it 186–137. The bill now heads to Canada’s Senate.





