
Transgenderism is a Massive, Uncontrolled Experiment on Children
“Removing healthy breasts is irrevocable and unconscionable,” said Ruth Institute President Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., in response to the California Department of Insurance stating insurance companies must pay for the breast removal of teenaged girls “transitioning” to boys.
Further, these operations are no longer to be considered cosmetic but required “reconstructive” surgery to remove “abnormal structures of the body caused by congenital defects.” Morse responded, “How’s that for a string of euphemisms?
“Is anyone telling these children that this move is irrevocable?” Morse asked.
“Is anyone telling them that regardless of how they feel in the future, they are giving up their ability to breastfeed a child forever?”
Morse also noted:
“Late last year, a high court in the United Kingdom ruled that minors suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to give informed consent to hormone-blocking drugs. But in California, minors can consent to double mastectomies.
“The California Department of Insurance has become a rubber stamp for the gay lobby,” Morse said. “Its decision isn’t medical but ideological. It’s based on the dogma that if a teenaged girl decides she’s a boy and wants to have her body surgically altered to resemble that of a boy, her decision must be celebrated and facilitated.
“What insanity, for someone in authority to tell impressionable teenaged girls that if they think they might want to be a boy, their breasts are just getting in the way and they should go under the surgeon’s knife.”
Dr. Michelle Cretella, MD, FCP, President of the American College of Pediatricians flatly stated:
“This active promotion of transgenderism has resulted in massive uncontrolled and unconsented experimentation on children and adolescents. This is child abuse.”
Dr. Cretella spoke at the Ruth Institute’s 2020 Summit for Survivors of the Sexual Revolution on “Medical Tragedies of the Sexual Revolution.”
On January 5, Morse was interviewed on the California Insurance Department’s decision on the One America News Network:
[Photo by Cory Woodward on Unsplash]
Recent Articles:
6 July 2026
6.4 MINS
As America marks 250 years of independence, most know little about the document that launched the nation — and even less about why it mattered. The Declaration of Independence is a revolutionary argument that asserts that all people are created equal and that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed.
6 July 2026
5 MINS
Vaccine mandates fundamentally conflict with the core principles of modern bioethics — autonomy, informed consent, beneficence, and non‑maleficence. True consent must be voluntary and free from coercion, deception, or informational manipulation.
6 July 2026
3.4 MINS
More than a decade after same-sex marriage was legalised in America, recent polling reveals public support for it — as well as for gender ideology — has declined significantly. Why? People are no longer evaluating the promises given, but the results received — and the results are changing their minds.
3 July 2026
4.4 MINS
After Germany demolished Curaçao 7-1 at the 2026 World Cup, players from both teams prayed together in a remarkable moment. But Christian faith and prayer runs far deeper in the Curaçao team than that one glimpse might indicate.
3 July 2026
3.1 MINS
When two massive earthquakes devastated Venezuela on 24 June, killing thousands and displacing millions, it was Christian aid organisations that arrived before most overseas aid, with field hospitals, food, water, and medical teams. Yet Christian relief work remains largely unrecognised by a world that sometimes views it with suspicion.
2 July 2026
3.1 MINS
The Nigerian government said Christians were not being massacred. Mainstream media agreed. A new report from the Observatory for Religious Freedom in Africa says otherwise — and the numbers are devastating.
1 July 2026
3.3 MINS
In a recent annual report from Buckingham Palace, the title “Defender of the Faith” has been replaced with a multi-faith alternative in describing King Charles III’s duties.





